When Godly People Differ (Acts 15: 36-41)

For an ad-free version of the podcast plus the opportunity to enjoy hours of exclusive content and two bonus episodes a month and also help keep the Bible Project Daily Podcast free  for listeners everywhere at;
patreon.com/JeremyMcCandless

Subscribe here to receive my new church history podcast every few weeks at.
https://thehistoryofthechristianchurch.buzzsprout.com

Welcome

 In today's episode, I look into an important turn of events in the early—a story that reminds us that even godly people can experience sharp disagreements. How should we handle such conflicts? Join us as we learn from the lives of Paul and Barnabas in Acts 15:36-41, and discover how to navigate disagreements in a way that honours God and furthers His mission.

Episode Notes: 

Introduction

We all differ physically, culturally, and spiritually. Even deeply committed Christians can have sharp disagreements. Paul and Barnabas, early church leaders and ministry partners, had a significant conflict over John Mark, recorded in Acts 15:36-41.

Key Points

1. Conflict Among Believers: Disagreements are inevitable, even among godly people.
2. Handling Conflict:
   • Background: Paul and Barnabas shared a deep bond and history of ministry.
   • Disagreement Over John Mark: Barnabas wanted to give him a second chance; Paul did not trust him due to past failure.
   • Result: They parted ways to continue their respective ministries.
3. Lessons from the Conflict:
   • Believers Will Disagree: Disagreements are normal.
   • Conflict Can Lead to Growth: Handled correctly, it can open new ministry opportunities.
   • Respecting Different Perspectives: Both Paul and Barnabas had valid points.
   • Reconciliation: Paul later reconciled with John Mark, showing no lingering bitterness.
4. Paul and Barnabas' Disagreement:
   • Human Imperfection: Even spiritual leaders have flaws and disagreements.
   • Different Approaches: Barnabas focused on individual care; Paul on the mission’s overall impact.
   • Handling Disagreement: The key is in how we handle disagreements, focusing on the mission and seeking reconciliation.
5. Strengthening the Ch

Transcript

 "When Godley People Differ." (Acts 15: 36-41)

Transcript:

It’s an obvious thing to say but human beings are all different from each other, we can be different not just physically but culturally and ethnically as well. That's not exactly an amazing insightful revelation but less obvious is the fact that this principal applies spiritually as well. People have different perspectives and convictions. It's a matter of fact that even deeply committed and godly people can have sharp disagreements. This brings us to a well-known conflict in the Bible between two of its most early prominent leaders: Paul and Barnabas. Their disagreement is recorded in Acts 15:36-41. They had been partners in ministry, traveling and preaching the Word of God together. They were a dynamic duo—Barnabas, known for his encouragement and relational skills, and Paul, with his brilliant theological mind. Together, they had a powerful impact on the early church. But even these two close friends and ministry partners are seen to have a falling out, let’s look at it and see what it can teach us today…. OK, let's delve into Acts 15, beginning at verse 36: 36 Some time later Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us go back and visit the believers in all the towns where we preached the word of the Lord and see how they are doing.” 37 Barnabas wanted to take John, also called Mark, with them, 38 but Paul did not think it wise to take him, because he had deserted them in Pamphylia and had not continued with them in the work. 39 They had such a sharp disagreement that they parted company. Barnabas took Mark and sailed for Cyprus, 40 but Paul chose Silas and left, commended by the believers to the grace of the Lord. 41 He went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches. (Acts 15: 36-41) This passage begins with Paul and Barnabas planning to revisit the churches they had established on their first missionary journey. They wanted to see how the believers were doing and to encourage them in their faith. However, a disagreement arose over this guy we met earlier called John Mark. Barnabas wanted to take John Mark with them, but Paul objected because John Mark had previously abandoned them during their first journey. The contention between them was so much so that they decided to part ways. Barnabas took John Mark and sailed to Cyprus, while Paul chose Silas and continued his ministry elsewhere. This story highlights a significant reality: Some level of conflict is inevitable, even among believers. The question we should ask is, how should we respond to these conflicts? How can we resolve them in a way that honours God and preserves unity? First, let's consider the background. Paul and Barnabas had a deep bond between them. When Paul was first converted, it was Barnabas who vouched for him before the apostles in Jerusalem. Later, when Barnabas was sent to Antioch, he sought out Paul to join him in the ministry there. They had travelled together, faced persecution together, and experienced God's work firsthand together. They were more than colleagues; they were friends and partners in the gospel. Despite their close relationship, they faced a significant disagreement over John Mark. Barnabas, known for his ability to encourage people saw potential in John Mark and wanted to give him a second chance. Paul, however, focused on John Mark's previous failure and felt he was not reliable for the mission. It seems their disagreement was so intense, and they decided to part ways. This was not an easy decision, but it was necessary for the sake of their ministries. But of course, their separation allowed for the expansion of the gospel into different regions, as Barnabas and John Mark went one way and Paul and Silas went another. This story teaches us a few important lessons about handling conflicts: The first point also is that believers Will Disagree: Even godly and mature Christians will sometimes have disagreements. This is a normal part of human relationships. However, conflict Can Lead to Growth: When handled correctly, conflict can lead to greater ministry opportunities and growth and in this case Paul and Barnabas's separation resulted in the gospel being spread to more places. Therefore, it is important that we respect the different perspectives and convictions of others. Barnabas saw potential in John Mark that Paul did not. Both had valid points, but they approached the situation differently. While Paul and Barnabas parted ways, they did not hold grudges. Later in Paul's writings, we see evidence that he reconciled with John Mark, acknowledging his value in the ministry. We sometimes think that truly spiritual people always live in harmony, but that’s not always the case. Paul and Barnabas, both deeply spiritual men, had a significant disagreement and here it is over John Mark. Let’s consider their history: Barnabas had vouched for Paul when others doubted his conversion. He had also sought Paul out for ministry in Antioch, and they had travelled together on their first missionary journey. They had faced persecution and seen God work mightily. Despite their close partnership, they came to a point of sharp disagreement. This highlights that all Christians have flaws. Martin Luther once said, "I am rough, boisterous, stormy, and altogether war-like, fighting against innumerable monsters and devils. I am born for removing stumps and stones, cutting away thistles and thorns, and clearing wild forests." Luther, like all of us, had his imperfections. Yet, he was a deeply committed servant of God. Similarly, Paul and Barnabas were human. Barnabas, known for his relational skills, wanted to give John Mark a second chance. Paul, focused on the mission’s demands, did not want to risk taking someone who had previously abandoned the work. This difference in perspective led to this point of contention. One way to view their disagreement is as a conflict between individual care and group concern. Barnabas focused on John Mark’s potential and wanted to support him. Paul was concerned about the mission’s overall impact and the risk of John Mark leaving again. Both had valid points, but they prioritized different aspects. This kind of conflict is not uncommon in ministry. Different perspectives can lead to disagreements, and sometimes these disagreements become intense. Acts 15:39 says, "Then the contention became so sharp that they parted from one another." This was not a mild disagreement but a heated conflict with emotions involved. Even Christian leaders, deeply committed to God's work, can experience significant contention sometimes. This does not negate their faith or their commitment. It simply underscores their humanity. In such situations, what matters is how we handle the disagreement. In the case of Paul and Barnabas, they chose to part ways. Barnabas took John Mark and sailed to Cyprus, while Paul chose Silas and continued his ministry. They each continued to serve God, but in different directions. This passage teaches us that conflict, even among godly people, is inevitable but what matters is our response. Do we allow it to hinder the work of God, or do we find ways to move forward, even if that means parting ways for a time? In summary, good and godly people can and do differ. Disagreements and conflicts are part of life, even in ministry. The key is to handle them with grace, seeking to honour God and further His work, even if it means going separate ways. Like Paul and Barnabas we too need to handle our conflicts with a focus on God's mission and a heart for reconciliation. This was a good choice on the part of Paul. Silas was a Roman citizen, while Barnabas was Jewish. Paul was now going into Gentile territory, and having a Roman companion would serve him well. If you read carefully what happens after this, you discover they went to Thessalonica. Later, Paul writes two letters to the Thessalonians, and if you look carefully, both of those were co-written by Paul and Silas. Additionally, if you keep reading the New Testament, you will discover that at the end of 1 Peter, Silas is mentioned as the secretary writing for Peter. While we can't conclusively prove this is the same Silas who followed Paul, many believe it is. Silas was a good choice to accompany Paul. He replaced Barnabas, who was a loss at this point, but Silas was a great gain. The text says they went to strengthen the churches. This caught my attention, and I wondered, how did they do that? How did they strengthen the church? I have a suggestion based on what was said earlier about their first missionary journey. They went through all these towns, establishing churches, and then they returned to strengthen them. I think it's safe to say that at the bare minimum, this included education and discipleship which would indeed strengthened the church with the discipleship process. Let me put this in focus. Many churches today focus on inspiration. People want to go to a church that inspires them. There’s nothing wrong with that. People want to be inspired. However, if all you have is motivation, you won't end up being strong in the Word. You’ll can fall into the trap of just going to church every week for an emotional fix week after week. What really strengthens believers is being taught in the Word. Instruction strengthens people, not just inspiration on its own. Encouragment is different from inspiration, though there may be some overlap. The thrust of the New Testament is that you are to be instructed, encouraged, exhorted, and, if necessary, corrected and maybe even rebuked. These are the elements described in the New Testament that are necessary for us to be strengthened in the Lord and reach spiritual maturity. Paul and Silas went back to these churches, and through the ministry of the Word and teaching, they strengthened the believers. Sadly today I think that many Christians today know very little about what they believe. Surveys show shocking results regarding biblical knowledge. However, the more you know the Scriptures, the stronger you are in the Lord. So let's get down to answering the question: How did these godly men solve their conflict that boiled over into contention? Did they separate and leave in anger? I don't think so. For some of my Christian life, I looked at this passage and kept asking who was right. Was Barnabas right, or was Paul right? Should they have taken John Mark? A case can be made for either. Considering John Mark went on to write the Gospel of Mark. When Paul reached the end of his life, he requested Mark’s presence, showing there was no lingering bitterness. Later in 1 Corinthians 9, Paul mentions Barnabas in a way that suggests they were on the same page. They might have gotten angry during the debate, but I do not believe they left angry at each other. A case could be made that maybe Paul was right since the text says Paul and Silas departed, being commended by the brethren to the grace of God. It doesn't say that about Barnabas. However, I don't think this implies Barnabas was wrong. From this point on, Luke's purpose is to follow Paul's ministry. Barnabas and John Mark are no longer mentioned in Acts because the focus is now on Paul. Luke is showing that Paul had the backing of the church, and it goes without saying that Barnabas did as well, based on other scriptures. When there's conflict, is the solution just to separate? Should people get up and leave? Many people do that today, but it's the opposite of what scripture teaches. James 1 says to count it all joy when you face various trials. Hanging in there through conflict produces spiritual maturity. So, what is the solution? I suggest that Paul and Barnabas mutually reached a compromise. They separated not out of anger but because they figured out how it was the best way to continue the mission effectively. Paul suggested they revisit the churches where they had preached. Barnabas went to Cyprus with John Mark, while Paul retraced his steps in Asia Minor with Silas. This compromise allowed them to continue the work of strengthening the churches and spreading the Gospel both at the same times but in different ways. By taking separate routes, they were able to cover more ground and minister to more people. This decision shows that they were focused on the mission above all else, demonstrating that even in conflict, the work of God can continue effectively when approached with wisdom and grace. In other words, and this is my conclusion, when godly men differ, they work out a God-honouring compromise. Let me repeat this, Godly people are meant to work out a God-honoring compromise. I am talking about two peers in conflict. The reason I say that is because there are situations where there is conflict, and one person has authority over the other. For example, with parents and their children, the Bible instructs teenagers to obey their parents. In situations of subordination, there needs to be submission. This principle doesn’t apply to situations where two spiritually minded people who are equals have a disagreement. In those cases, they need to come up with a God-honouring compromise. Acts Chapter 15 is really instructive in this regard. Remember how we started out? This chapter begins with men coming and saying that you must be circumcised to be saved (verse 1). Others insisted on keeping the whole law (verse 5). At that point, the text is clear that Paul and Barnabas stayed together and refused to compromise anything that had to do with the gospel. So, the principle here is that we don’t compromise on the essentials of the Christian faith. These essentials are non-negotiable. The gospel—that Jesus is the Son of God who died and rose from the dead, and that salvation is by faith—is not up for debate or compromise. The Bible as the Word of God is a settled issue. However, many conflicts we face are not about essential issues. This chapter also illustrates that. They had conflicts over circumcision and food laws, which are non-essential issues. For example, regarding dietary laws, the advice was to be sensitive to those who were accustomed to certain practices. This calls for compromise on non-essential issues out of love and sensitivity. The famous AA Serenity Prayer relates to this idea of discerning what can and cannot be changed. It famously says, "God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference." This prayer highlights the need for wisdom in discerning what requires compromise. So, godly people come up with God-honouring compromises. I would like to read you the whole Serenity Prayer because it's often not fully quoted. It goes on to say, "Living one day at a time, enjoying one moment at a time, accepting hardship as the pathway to peace, taking this sinful world as it is, not as I would have it, trusting that He will make all things right if I surrender to His will, that I may be reasonably happy in this life and supremely happy with Him forever in the next. Amen." Another version begins with "Heavenly Father" and ends with "In Jesus' name," but the core message remains the same. The point is that there are things we cannot change, things we can change, and we need the wisdom to discern between the two. If you take away one thing from todays episode, let it be this: godly people, when in conflict, come up with God-honouring compromises and that is the loving thing to do? When there's conflict, let the emotions subside and try to come up with a creative, God-honouring compromise over non-essential issues. This reflects what it means to be loving, gracious, and gentle believers.